Cases 1 - 7 of 7
National Postal Policy Council, et al v. PRC
as 20-1505
Petitioner:
Major Mailers Association and National Postal Policy Council
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission
USPS v. PRC
as 16-1284
Petitioner:
United States Postal Service
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor:
National Postal Policy Council and Association for Postal Commerce
USPS v. PRC
as 16-1067
Petitioner:
United States Postal Service
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
National Postal Policy Council
USPS v. PRC
as 15-1297
Petitioner:
United States Postal Service
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
Valpak Direct Marketing Systems, Inc.
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
National Postal Policy Council, Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers, Association for Postal Commerce and others
Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers, et al v. PRC
as 14-1009
Petitioner:
Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers, American Catalog Mailers Association, Association for Postal Commerce and others
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent:
United States Postal Service
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
American Forest & Paper Association
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers, American Catalog Mailers Association, Association for Postal Commerce and others
USPS v. PRC
as 14-1010
Petitioner:
United States Postal Service
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
American Forest & Paper Association
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers, American Catalog Mailers Association, Association for Postal Commerce and others
USPS v. PRC
as 13-1308
Petitioner:
United States Postal Service
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
National Postal Policy Council, Association for Postal Commerce, Valpak Direct Marketing Systems, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
