Matthew A. Goldstein, PLLC v. DOS, et al

Matthew A. Goldstein, PLLC v. DOS, et al

Plaintiff - Appellant:	Matthew A. Goldstein, PLLC
Defendant - Appellee:	United States Department of State, John F. Kerry, in his official capacity as Secretary of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, Kenneth B. Handelman, in his official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary, Defense Trade Controls and Daniel L. Cook, in his official capacity as Chief of the Compliance, Registration, and Enforcement Division, Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance
Case Number:	16-5034
Filed:	February 23, 2016
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
March 14, 2017	Matthew A. Goldstein, PLLC v. DOS

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 14, 2017	Filing 1207910748 OPINION [1665836] filed (Pages: 12) for the Court by Judge Griffith. [16-5034]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Matthew A. Goldstein, PLLC v. DOS, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: Matthew A. Goldstein, PLLC
Represented By:	Matthew Goldstein
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: United States Department of State
Represented By:	DOJ Appellate Counsel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: John F. Kerry, in his official capacity as Secretary of State
Represented By:	DOJ Appellate Counsel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Directorate of Defense Trade Controls
Represented By:	DOJ Appellate Counsel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Kenneth B. Handelman, in his official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary, Defense Trade Controls
Represented By:	DOJ Appellate Counsel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Daniel L. Cook, in his official capacity as Chief of the Compliance, Registration, and Enforcement Division, Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance
Represented By:	DOJ Appellate Counsel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?