James Miller v. E. Rogers, et al
| James A. Miller |
| E. Rogers and U.S. Copyright Office |
| 22-5344 |
| December 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Patent |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RESPONSE [1981377] to order [ # 1979396-5 ] filed by James A. Miller (Service Date: 01/13/2023 by Clerk, CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 7 pages. [22-5344] [Entered: 01/13/2023 10:53 AM] |
| CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1980975] received from James Miller for order [1979398-2] sent to Appellant James A. Miller [22-5344] [Entered: 01/11/2023 09:03 AM] |
| CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1979398] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7021 0350 0001 9947 6802] of order [ # 1979396-5 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 01/27/2023 from James A. Miller. [22-5344] [Entered: 12/28/2022 04:24 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1979396] filed to show cause regarding dismissing case for lack of jurisdiction. Response to Order due 01/27/2023. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [22-5344] [Entered: 12/28/2022 04:18 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1979394] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:22-cv-02565-UNA filed by James A. Miller. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-5344. [22-5344] [Entered: 12/28/2022 04:07 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [22-5344] [Entered: 12/28/2022 04:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
