Cases 1 - 10 of 406
Miller v. Miller
as 3:2025cv00065
Plaintiff:
James L. Miller
Defendant:
James W. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SNAP! Mobile Inc v. Miller
as 2:2024cv01569
Defendant:
James Dylan Miller
Plaintiff:
SNAP! Mobile Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Miller, et al v. Bullseye Energy, et al
as 24-603
Petitioner:
JAMES H. MILLER, SHARON RIGSBY MILLER, CAROLYN R. ENLOE and others
Respondent:
BULLSEYE ENERGY, LLC, CEP MIDCONTINENT, LLC, KRS&K and others
Clarke et al v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
as 1:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
Aristotle International, Inc., Predict It, Inc., Kevin Clarke and others
Defendant:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
HARO v. STARK
as 1:2024cv01294
Plaintiff:
ABIGAIL HARO
Other:
ALAN M. STARK
Cross Defendant:
KEVIN B. PIERCY, TAYLOR R. EALAND, JAMES D. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
as 3:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
James C Miller
Defendant:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller et al v. Target Corporation
as 1:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Susie J. Miller and James J. Miller
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
THOMAS v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
MARIO M THOMAS
Defendant:
JAMES WILLIAM MILLER, SHAWN SWAIN and DAWN A HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Societal CDMO, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02161
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Societal CDMO, Inc., Wayne B. Weisman, William L. Ashton and others
Smith v. Societal CDMO, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Morgan Smith
Defendant:
Societal CDMO, Inc., Wayne B. Weisman, William L. Ashton and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
