Maria Esparraguera v. Department of the Army, et al
| Maria Esparraguera |
| Department of the Army, Christine E. Wormuth, Secretary of the Army, Gabe Camarillo, Under Secretary of the Army and Merit Systems Protection Board |
| 23-5002 |
| January 6, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Statutes APA/Review Agency |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [1985722] filed granting appellant's unopposed motion to govern future proceedings [ # 1984802-2 ], setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 04/07/2023. APPENDIX due 04/07/2023. APPELLEES Brief due on 06/07/2023. APPELLANT Reply Brief due 06/27/2023 [22-5150, 23-5002] [Entered: 02/13/2023 02:18 PM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION [1984802] to govern future proceedings filed by Maria Esparraguera in 22-5150, 23-5002 [Service Date: 02/06/2023 ] Length Certification: 1141 Words. [22-5150, 23-5002] (Lamken, Jeffrey) [Entered: 02/06/2023 07:24 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1980546] filed consolidating cases 23-5002 (Consolidation started 01/06/2023) with 22-5150; directing party to file motions to govern future proceedings by 02/06/2023. Case No. 22-5150 is removed from abeyance [22-5150, 23-5002] [Entered: 01/06/2023 04:04 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1980477] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:22-cv-01109-TJK filed by Maria Esparraguera. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-5002. [23-5002] [Entered: 01/06/2023 01:47 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [23-5002] [Entered: 01/06/2023 01:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
