Timothy Petrozzi v. Muriel Bowser, et al
| Timothy R. Petrozzi |
| Muriel Bowser, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Kash Patel, United States Department of Justice, Central Intelligence Agency, Rudolph Contreras, United States Post Office, Lidl and H. Cruz Alvarez, Metropolitan Police Department Ofc. |
| 26-5035 |
| January 28, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| AUDIO/VIDEO SUBMISSION FORM [2165139] filed by Timothy R. Petrozzi. (For Internal Use Only: Form is only available to case participants and court staff) . [26-5035] [Entered: 03/23/2026 05:55 PM] |
| AUDIO/VIDEO SUBMISSION FORM [2165140] filed by Timothy R. Petrozzi. (For Internal Use Only: Form is only available to case participants and court staff) . [26-5035] [Entered: 03/23/2026 05:56 PM] |
| APPELLANT BRIEF [2165285] filed by Timothy R. Petrozzi [Service Date: 03/24/2026 ] Length of Brief: 3 pages. [26-5035] [Entered: 03/24/2026 12:13 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [26-5035] [Entered: 01/28/2026 02:35 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2156363] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:25-cv-03582-UNA filed by Timothy R. Petrozzi. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 26-5035. [26-5035] [Entered: 01/28/2026 02:36 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2156366] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 03/19/2026. APPENDIX due 03/19/2026. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [26-5035] [Entered: 01/28/2026 02:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
