Jamie Garman, et al v. Kash Patel, et al
| Jamie Garman, Blaire Toleman and Michelle Ball, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated |
| Kash Patel, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Pamela J. Bondi, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice and Todd Blanche, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States |
| Borealis S. Hedling |
| 26-5110 |
| April 10, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Statutes APA/Review Agency |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION [2176827] for summary affirmance, to dismiss case filed by Jamie Garman, Michelle Ball and Blaire Toleman (Service Date: 06/04/2026 by 3rd Party) Length Certification: 1,802. [26-5110] (Eisenberg, Daniel) [Entered: 06/04/2026 03:33 PM] |
| MOTION [2175914] to extend time to file motion to 07/20/2026 filed by Todd Blanche, DOJ and FBI (Service Date: 05/30/2026 by US Mail, CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 328 words. [26-5110] (Sampat, Dhruman) [Entered: 05/30/2026 05:24 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2174214] filed by Pamela J. Bondi, DOJ, FBI and Kash Patel [Service Date: 05/20/2026 ] [26-5110] (Sampat, Dhruman) [Entered: 05/20/2026 09:58 AM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2174210] filed by Dhruman Y. Sampat and co-counsel Johnny H. Walker, III on behalf of Appellees Pamela J. Bondi, DOJ, FBI and Kash Patel. [26-5110] (Sampat, Dhruman) [Entered: 05/20/2026 09:43 AM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2174178] filed by Jamie Garman, Michelle Ball and Blaire Toleman [Service Date: 05/19/2026 ] [26-5110] (Eisenberg, Daniel) [Entered: 05/19/2026 05:33 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2174177] filed by Daniel M. Eisenberg on behalf of Appellees Jamie Garman, Michelle Ball and Blaire Toleman. [26-5110] (Eisenberg, Daniel) [Entered: 05/19/2026 05:16 PM] |
| NOTICE [2169349] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court is filed [Case Number 26-5110: IFP] [26-5110] [Entered: 04/20/2026 09:45 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2169350] filed removing case from abeyance; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 05/20/2026. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 05/20/2026. APPELLANT statement of issues due 05/20/2026. APPELLANT underlying decision due 05/20/2026. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 05/20/2026. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 05/20/2026. APPELLANT transcript status report due 05/20/2026. APPELLANT procedural motions due 05/20/2026. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 06/04/2026; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 05/20/2026. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 05/20/2026. APPELLEE procedural motions due 05/20/2026. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 06/04/2026. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. [26-5110] [Entered: 04/20/2026 09:46 AM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [26-5110] [Entered: 04/10/2026 01:14 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2168038] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:26-cv-01086-JMC filed by Borealis S. Hedling. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 26-5110. [26-5110] [Entered: 04/10/2026 01:16 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2168043] filed holding case in abeyance. Case 26-5110 held in abeyance pending decision in 1:26cv1086-JMC from U.S. District Court; The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the district court. [26-5110] [Entered: 04/10/2026 01:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
