Pascal Gedeon v. USA, et al
| Pascal Gedeon |
| United States of America, Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Attorney's Office, Executive Office for United States Attorneys, United States Department of Justice, Office of Information Policy, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 26-5275 |
| July 27, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| US PRISONER CASE docketed. [26-5275] [Entered: 07/27/2026 02:23 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2185261] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:26-cv-01606-UNA filed by Pascal Gedeon. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 26-5275. [26-5275] [Entered: 07/27/2026 02:25 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2185264] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 08/26/2026; directing party to file ifp prisoner submissions: APPELLANT prisoner trust account report due 08/26/2026. APPELLANT consent to collection form due 08/26/2026. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [26-5275] [Entered: 07/27/2026 02:29 PM] |
| LETTER [2185274] sent to warden sending Clerk order [ # 2185264-5 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 08/26/2026. [26-5275] [Entered: 07/27/2026 02:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
