In re: Centen
| MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office |
| In re: COREY CENTEN, NILESH PATEL and PHYSIO-CONTROL, INC. |
| 16-2739 |
| September 30, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER filed. The motion [ # 5 ] is granted. The appeal is dismissed. Each side shall bear its own costs. ISSUED AS A MANDATE: October 25, 2016. Service: 10/25/2016 by clerk. [377344] [LMS] [Entered: 10/25/2016 10:11 AM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION of Appellants Corey Centen, Nilesh Patel and Physio-Control, Inc. to terminate appeal through Dismissal. [Consent: unopposed]. Service: 10/24/2016 by email. [376937] [Allen Sokal] [Entered: 10/24/2016 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interest for the Appellants Corey Centen, Nilesh Patel and Physio-Control, Inc.. Service: 10/14/2016 by email. [374284] [Allen Sokal] [Entered: 10/14/2016 12:57 PM] |
| Filing 3 Entry of appearance for William F. Smith as of counsel for Appellants Corey Centen, Nilesh Patel and Physio-Control, Inc.. Service: 10/14/2016 by email. [374282] [Allen Sokal] [Entered: 10/14/2016 12:56 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Allen M. Sokal as principal counsel for Appellants Corey Centen, Nilesh Patel and Physio-Control, Inc.. Service: 10/14/2016 by email. [374278] [Allen Sokal] [Entered: 10/14/2016 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 09/30/2016. [370543] Entry of Appearance due 10/14/2016. Certificate of Interest is due on 10/14/2016. Docketing Statement due 10/31/2016. Certified List due on 11/09/2016. [AT] [Entered: 09/30/2016 01:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
