Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Thompson et al v. Medtronic Public Limited Company et al
as 1:2020cv01111
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, Physio-Control Manufacturing, Inc., Bain Capital, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Leatha J. Holt, William T. Holt, Newair Manufacturing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
WALLS et al v. MEDTRONIC, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03690
Plaintiff:
EDWARD WALLS and TONYA CHAVIS-WALLS
Defendant:
MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC USA, INC. and PHYSIO-CONTROL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson et al v. Medtronic Public Limited Company et al
as 2:2019cv02038
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, Physio-Control Manufacturing, Inc., Bain Capital, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Leatha J. Holt, William T. Holt, Newair Manufacturing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Thompson et al v. Medtronic et al
as 2:2016cv03013
Plaintiff:
Darrell K. Thompson , William T. Holt , Leatha J. Holt and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. , Physio-Control International, Inc. , Physio-Control, Inc. and others
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
In re: Centen
as 16-2739
Appellee:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Appellant:
In re: COREY CENTEN, NILESH PATEL and PHYSIO-CONTROL, INC.
Neufeld et al v. Town Of Ramapo et al
as 1:2014cv07089
Plaintiff:
Myra Neufeld
Defendant:
Town Of Ramapo , Town of Ramapo Parks & Recreation Department and Physio-Control, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VASQUEZ v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY et al
as 1:2013cv04146
Plaintiff:
AMY VASQUEZ
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER COUNTY, GLOUCESTER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, CARMEL M. MORINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00649
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc, Physio-Control Inc, Williams A Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
