Gilbert Hyatt v. Vidal
Cross Appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Case Number: 19-1038
Filed: October 5, 2018
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions (Fed. Qst.)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2022 Filing 6 Official caption revised to reflect Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Katherine K. Vidal as Appellant. (see attached). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [843091] [18-2390, 18-2391, 18-2392, 19-1038, 19-1039, 19-1049, 19-1070] [MVH] [Entered: 04/14/2022 11:50 AM]
June 1, 2021 Filing 5 PARTIAL JUDGMENT. VACATED-IN-PART AND REMANDED. Terminated on the merits after oral argument. COSTS: No Costs. Mandate to issue in due course. For information regarding costs, petitions for rehearing, and petitions for writs of certiorari click # here . [777765] [18-2390, 18-2391, 18-2392, 19-1038, 19-1039, 19-1049, 19-1070]--[Edited 06/07/2021 by MJL to reflect that this is a partial judgment] [MVH] [Entered: 06/01/2021 09:40 AM]
June 1, 2021 Filing 4 OPINION filed for the court by Reyna, Circuit Judge; Wallach, Circuit Judge and Hughes, Circuit Judge. Precedential Opinion. [777764] [18-2390, 18-2391, 18-2392, 19-1038, 19-1039, 19-1049, 19-1070] [MVH] [Entered: 06/01/2021 09:38 AM]
January 22, 2021 Filing 3 Official caption revised to reflect Andrew Hirshfeld, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, as appellant (see attached). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [751033] [18-2390, 18-2391, 18-2392, 19-1038, 19-1039, 19-1049, 19-1070] [JAL] [Entered: 01/22/2021 01:21 PM]
October 5, 2018 Filing 2 Note to file: The following cases are associated:18-2390 (lead) with 19-1038 (cross-appeal to 18-2392) & 19-1039 (cross-appeal to 18-2391). FURTHER ENTRIES WILL BE ADDED TO THE LEAD APPEAL ONLY. [555232] [18-2390, 19-1038, 19-1039, 18-2391, 18-2392] [SJ] [Entered: 10/05/2018 12:08 PM]
October 5, 2018 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 10/02/2018. [555221] . [SJ] [Entered: 10/05/2018 11:42 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gilbert Hyatt v. Vidal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT
Represented By: Andrew M. Grossman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Represented By: Thomas W. Krause
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Represented By: Thomas W. Krause
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Represented By: Thomas W. Krause
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?