Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
SawStop Holding LLC v. Hirshfeld
as 21-1537
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAWSTOP HOLDING LLC
Defendant / Appellee: ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Vox Populi Registry Ltd.In re: Vox Populi Registry Ltd. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1496
Appellee: ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Appellant: In re: VOX POPULI REGISTRY LTD.
In re: MTD Products Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1474
Appellant: In re: MTD PRODUCTS INC and In re: MTD PRODUCTS INC.
Appellee: ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
In re: Marshall
as 21-1425
Appellant: In re: KEVIN LEON MARSHALL, SEAN M. MCSWEENEY and ALEXANDER VILLACORTA
Appellee: ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
In re: Marshall
as 21-1426
Appellant: In re: KEVIN LEON MARSHALL, ALEXANDER VILLACORTA and DAVID J. DEMELLO
Appellee: ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 20-2323
Plaintiff / Appellee: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 20-2325
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Director of the USPTO, ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Director of the USPTO and ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Director of the USPTO
Plaintiff / Appellee: GILBERT P. HYATT
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2321
Plaintiff / Appellee: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 20-2324
Plaintiff / Appellee: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Gilbert Hyatt v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
as 20-1923
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE and ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?