Jones v. DOJ
KEVIN D. JONES |
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE |
22-1788 |
May 13, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Jones v. Merit Systems Protection Board |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Certified list received. Service: 05/18/2022 by email. Refer to Fed. Cir. R. 31 for calculating brief deadlines from service of the certified list. [850674] [EKD] [Entered: 05/19/2022 11:44 AM] |
Filing 9 Corrected Certificate of Interest for Petitioner Kevin D. Jones. Service: 05/17/2022 by email. [850349] [22-1788] [Avni Amin] [Entered: 05/17/2022 05:12 PM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Petitioner Kevin D. Jones, Corrected Certificate of Interest [ # 7 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document is due on 05/24/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [850339] [EKD] [Entered: 05/17/2022 04:37 PM] |
Filing 7 Corrected Certificate of Interest for Petitioner Kevin D. Jones. Service: 05/17/2022 by email. [850330] [22-1788] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 8 ] [Avni Amin] [Entered: 05/17/2022 03:46 PM] |
Filing 6 Corrected Entry of appearance for Avni J. Amin as counsel for Petitioner Kevin D. Jones. Service: 05/17/2022 by email. [850329] [22-1788] [Avni Amin] [Entered: 05/17/2022 03:45 PM] |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submissions of Petitioner Kevin D. Jones, Certificate of Interest and Entry of Appearance [ # 2 ], [ # 3 ], are not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant documents are due on 05/24/2022. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [850150] [EKD] [Entered: 05/17/2022 09:13 AM] |
Filing 4 Statement Concerning Discrimination pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) for Petitioner Kevin D. Jones. Service: 05/16/2022 by email. [850113] [22-1788] [Avni Amin] [Entered: 05/16/2022 10:05 PM] |
Filing 3 Entry of appearance for Avni J. Amin as counsel for Petitioner Kevin D. Jones. Service: 05/16/2022 by email. [850112] [22-1788] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 5 ] [Avni Amin] [Entered: 05/16/2022 10:05 PM] |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interest for Petitioner Kevin D. Jones. Service: 05/16/2022 by email. [850111] [22-1788] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 5 ] [Avni Amin] [Entered: 05/16/2022 10:03 PM] |
Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 05/12/2022. [849751] 15(c) due on 05/27/2022. Entry of Appearance due 05/27/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 05/27/2022. Docketing Statement due 06/13/2022. Certified List due on 06/22/2022. [EKD] [Entered: 05/13/2022 02:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Jones v. DOJ | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: KEVIN D. JONES | |
Represented By: | Avni Amin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE | |
Represented By: | Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.