Cases 1 - 10 of 12,121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02279
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jacqueline Stevens v. DOJ, et al
as 24-3215
Defendant:
UNITED STATES NAVY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE STEVENS
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2024cv03380
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2024cv03387
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Saenz (PS) v. United States Department of Justice Immigration and Naturalization Services et al
as 1:2024cv03351
Petitioner:
Horacio Arraz Saenz
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice Immigration and Naturalization Services and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zloza, Joseph v. City Of New Lisbon et al
as 3:2024cv00853
Defendant:
City of Mauston, Juneau County, Department of Navy and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zloza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zloza, Joseph v. City of New Lisbon et al
as 3:2024cv00854
Defendant:
Milwaukee Federal Court, Department of Navy, Undercover FBI and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zloza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haneef Jackson-Bey v. DOJ
as 24-3193
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
HANEEF JACKSON-BEY
Joseph Gilberti, Jr. v. Donald Trump, et al
as 24-13948
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, JACK SMITH, BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DENNIS GILBERTI, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
