Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 561
McGore v. Hood et al
as 2:2024cv10999
Plaintiff: Darryl McGore
Defendant: Denise Hood, United States Supreme Court, US Congress and others
Donald Parsons v. USA, et al
as 24-3297
Plaintiff: DONALD L. PARSONS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
McGore v. US District Court Judges et al
as 2:2024cv10890
Plaintiff: Darryl McGore
Defendant: US District Court Judges, Denise Hood, US Supreme Court Justices and others
Doe v. Department of Justice
as 2:2024cv00434
Plaintiff: Dispatcher John Doe
Defendant: Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Anthony Stokes v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5034
Petitioner: ANTHONY DARNELL STOKES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, GARY SWANEY, Warden, FCI Manchester and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
U.S. Department of Justice v. Lake Trust Credit Union We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024mc50009
Petitioner: U.S. Department of Justice
Respondent: Lake Trust Credit Union
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6123
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Morilha v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 3:2023cv01334
Plaintiff: Daniel Vitor Morilha
Defendant: U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Mawule Tepe v. Travis R. McDonough, et al
as 23-6092
Plaintiff / Appellant: MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee: TRAVIS RANDALL MCDONOUGH, in his U.S. District Chief Judge position, JANE DOE, I, U.S. District Court's Clerk at Chattanooga, TN, in her personal position, JANE DOE, II, U.S. District Court's Clerk at Chattanooga, TN, in her personal position and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?