Diaz-Holguin v. Keisler et al
Petitioner: Dimas Armando Diaz-Holguin
Respondent: Peter Keisler, Kevin D. Rooney, EOIR and Michael Chertoff
Case Number: 1:2008cv00460
Filed: March 5, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee Office
County: Denver
Presiding Judge: John L. Kane
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Watanabe
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER. The magistrate judges Recommendation on Respondents Motion To Dismiss (Docket No. 14) 27 filed 02/25/2009, is APPROVED and ADOPTED as an order of this court. The respondents Motion To Dismiss 14 filed 05/02/2008 is GRANTED. as to the app licants claim concerning his detention by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The Petitioners Memorandum of Law in Support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 11 filed 04/03/2008, read as an application for writ of habeas corpus, is DENIED as moot as to the applicants claim concerning his detention by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The respondents Motion To Dismiss 14 filed 05/02/2008, is DENIED otherwise. As required by 28 U.S.C. § 1631, the applicants claim challenging the apparent reinstatement of the order of removal concerning the applicant is TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. This case is CLOSED by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 03/16/2009.(sah, )
February 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER granting 10 Petitioners [sic] Motion to Amend Memorandum in Support by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 02/25/2009.TEXT ONLY ENTRY - NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED (sah, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diaz-Holguin v. Keisler et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dimas Armando Diaz-Holguin
Represented By: John Elliott Reardon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Peter Keisler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kevin D. Rooney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: EOIR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michael Chertoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?