Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Rodriguez v. Barrows et al
as 2:2018cv14460
Defendant:
Supervisor Peter Keisler, Sergeant Fernandez, Captain Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Dario M. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIERZWA v. ASHCROFT et al
as 2:2017cv02625
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. MIERZWA
Defendant:
JOHN ASHCROFT, ALBERTO GONZALEZ, PAUL CLEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOURE v. KLAPAKIS et al
as 2:2008cv02517
Plaintiff:
KONIBA TOURE
Defendant:
EVANGELIA KLAPAKIS, JONATHAN SCHARFEN, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00460
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00232
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Aragon v. Chertoff et al
as 6:2007cv02045
Petitioner:
John H. Aragon
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez, Peter Keisler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hajmirfattah v. Keisler et al
as 3:2007cv00892
Plaintiff:
Farrokh Hajmirfattah
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzales, Michael Jaromin and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Xu v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv07114
Plaintiff:
Yao Xu
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Ruth Dorochoff, Gerard Heinauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
