Bahadori v. Milyard et al
Peyman R. Bahadori |
Kevin Milyard and John Suthers |
1:2008cv00539 |
March 17, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Logan |
Edward W. Nottingham |
Boyd N. Boland |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ORDER Returning 33 State Court Records by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 4/22/2016. (evana, ) |
Filing 40 MINUTE ORDER denying 39 Motion Requesting the Court to Take Judicial Notice. Entered by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 8/4/10. (wydcd, rrk) |
Filing 37 ORDER of DISMISSAL. Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice. No certificate of appealability will issue, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 7/29/10. (gmssl, ) |
Filing 35 ORDER of Recusal. Judge's file to be returned to clerk's office for the case to be reassigned, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 6/7/10. (gmssl, ) |
Filing 32 ORDER: re: 3 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Peyman R. Bahadori. On or before March 5, 2010, the respondents shall provide the Court with the complete record from the state trial court and all briefs and pleadings filed in the state supreme and appellate courts in the criminal prosecution and post- conviction proceedings that underlie the Application, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/3/10. (bnbcd, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.