Cases 1 - 10 of 267
Clark v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00992
Plaintiff:
Willie Dwayne Clark
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Rick Raemisch , Angel Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Hyberg
as 15-1244
Petitioner:
DARREL ALAN HYBERG
Respondent:
KEVIN MILYARD, Warden, Sterling Correctional Facility and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Walker v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 14-1462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, in his individual capacity, BILL RITTER, JR., in his individual capacity, TOM CLEMENTS, in his individual and official capacities and others
Roemer et al v. Carochi et al
as 1:2014cv01655
Plaintiff:
Heather Roemer and Samantha McClellan
Defendant:
Tony Carochi, Kevin Milyard, Lou Archuleta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Clark v. Colorado Department of Corrections
as 1:2014cv01594
Plaintiff:
Willie Dwayne Clark
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Angel Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2014cv01062
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Walker
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Aristedes W. Zavaras, Tony Carochi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guion v. Spurlock et al
as 1:2014cv00391
Plaintiff:
Curtis Guion
Defendant:
Spurlock, Spurlock (I), Witz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toevs v. Milyard, et al
as 13-1476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANOS TOEVS
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN MILYARD, RICK RAEMISCH, DCOC, ARISTEDES ZAVARES and others
Dunlap v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2013cv03117
Plaintiff:
Nathan Jerard Dunlap
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Rick (I) Raemisch, Mark Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perrian v. Harms et al
as 1:2013cv02951
Plaintiff:
Randy Perrian
Defendant:
Allen Harms, Allen (I) Harms, Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
