Sanderson v. Aurora, City of et al
| Ronald Sanderson |
| Aurora, City of, Police S.W.A.T. Members, Harrold Brant, Dave Kreiger, Daniel Oates and Craig Morgan |
| 1:2008cv00756 |
| April 15, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Prison Condition Office |
| Arapahoe |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER. The recommendation is accepted. Defendants Motion to Dismissfor Plaintiffs Failure to Comply with Courts Order 74 is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 08/27/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
76
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 74 Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply with Court's Order be granted and that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to make monthly payments of twenty percent of his preceding month's income until his filing fee was paid in full, or show cause each month that he has no assets with which to make the monthly payment, all as directed by the Court's orders, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/6/09. (ebs, )
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER denying 56 plaintiffs Motion to File an Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 01/26/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
54
MINUTE ORDER granting 52 Motion for Leave of Court to Depose Plaintiff Ronald Sanderson by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 01/05/2009.(sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
