Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LeAnder Gregg v. Correct Care Solutions, et al
as 20-2008
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS KERNS, Officer, DANIEL OATES, Officer, DAVID PETERSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEANDER J. GREGG
Marner v. Jones et al
as 1:2015cv02678
Plaintiff:
Zachary Marner
Defendant:
Terry (I) Jones, Terry Jones, Daniel (I) Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. City of Aurora, et al
as 15-1146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH MURPHY
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CITY OF AURORA and DANIEL OATES, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Chief of the Aurora Police Department
Murphy v. City of Aurora, The et al
as 1:2013cv02539
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Murphy
Defendant:
City of Aurora, The , Daniel (I) Oates and Daniel Oates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sears v. City of Aurora, et al
as 1:2012cv02836
Plaintiff:
Marc Sears
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Daniel Oates and Dan (I) Oates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wilson v. City of Aurora, et al
as 10-1408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF AURORA, A Municipality, DANIEL OATES, Chief of the Aurora Police Department, in his official capacity, RICKY BENNETT, Former Chief of the Auorora Police Department, in his indiidual capacity and others
Wilson v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2009cv02138
Plaintiff:
William Wilson
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Daniel Oates, Ricky Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenta v. Aurora, City of et al
as 1:2008cv00968
Plaintiff:
Allen J. Kenta
Defendant:
Aurora, City of, Aurora Police Department, Daniel Oates and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sanderson v. Aurora, City of et al
as 1:2008cv00756
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sanderson
Defendant:
Aurora, City of, Police S.W.A.T. Members, Harrold Brant and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
