Stilling v. Milyard et al
Petitioner: Steven Stilling
Respondent: Kevin Milyard and John Suthers
Case Number: 1:2008cv01714
Filed: August 13, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Logan
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER Returning 22 State Court Records by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 4/12/2010. (erv, )
October 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Denying 23 Applicant's Motion to Review the State Court Record. Applicant's remaining ineffective assistance of counsel claims are dismissed for lack of merit. The amended habeas corpus application is denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear his own costs and attorney's fees, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/15/09.(ebs, )
July 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER for State Court Record. Ordered that Respondents shall provide to this Court within 20 days the complete record of Mr. Stilling's trial in Denver District Court. Ordered that the Clerk of the Denver District Court produce the records as de scribed in this Order that are in their possession and provide the records to counsel for Respondents in this case for filing with this Court. ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court send a copy of this Order to both parties and to the Clerk of the District Court for the City and County of Denver, Attn: Criminal Appeals, 1437 Bannock Street, Room 256, Denver, CO 80202 by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 07/01/09. (jjh, )
June 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER FOR STATE COURT RECORD that Respondents shall provide to this Court within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order the complete record of Mr. Stillings trial in Denver District Court Case Nos. 97CR275, 97CR276, and 97CR300. It is FURTHER O RDERED that the Clerk of the Denver District Court produce the records as described in this Order that are in their possession and provide the records to counsel for Respondents in this case for filing with this Court. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court send a copy of this Order to both parties and to the Clerk of the District Court for the City and County of Denver, Attn: Criminal Appeals, 1437 Bannock Street, Room 256, Denver, CO 80202. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 6/25/09. (erv, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stilling v. Milyard et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven Stilling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kevin Milyard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John Suthers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?