Cunningham v. Astrue
| Candace Lou Cunningham |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| SSA Noticing |
| 1:2008cv02774 |
| December 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office |
| Denver |
| John L. Kane |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER 24 Stipulation for Attorney Fees is approved and defendant to pay the amount of $3,000.00 to plaintiff for attorney fees under EAJA. Award may be payable to plaintiff and mailed to plaintiff's counsel, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/6/10.(gms, )
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER. Commissioners decision is reversed and the case is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this Order. It is further recommended that the Commissioner assign the case to a different ALJ for all further proceedings, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 1/7/10. (gmssl, ) Modified on 1/8/2010 to correct the date signed by the judicial officer(gmssl, ).
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Oral Argument set for 9/10/2009 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 602 before Judge Christine M. Arguello, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 6/30/09. (gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
8
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 4/30/2009. SS Defendants Brief due by 6/2/2009. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 6/16/2009, by Judge John L. Kane on 3/23/09. (gms, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
