Matthews v. Astrue
| Karen Matthews |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| SSA Noticing |
| 1:2009cv00051 |
| January 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office |
| Pueblo |
| John L. Kane |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER granting 19 Stipulated Motion for Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. Defendant is to pay the amount of $5,000.00 to Plaintiff for attorney fees under the EAJA. Payment shall constitute a complete releas e from and bar to any and all claims Plaintiff may have relating to EAJA costs and fees. This award is without prejudice to the right of Plaintiffs counsel to seek attorney fees under section 206(b) of the Social Security Act, 42, U.S.C. §406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 2/3/10.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER The 6/2/08 administrative decision is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner with directions to remand to the Administrative Law Judge for proceedings consistent with this opinion, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 9/24/09. (gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
10
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 6/23/2009. SS Defendants Brief due by 7/23/2009. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 8/6/2009, by Judge John L. Kane on 5/15/09. (gmssl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
