Doyle v. Ritter et al
| Michael Doyle |
| Bill Ritter, Jr., Aristedes W. Zavaras, Kevin Milyard and Chapole Laine |
| 1:2009cv00066 |
| January 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Prison Condition Office |
| Logan |
| Zita L. Weinshienk |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re: 11 Notice of Appeal filed by Michael Doyle by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 03/11/09. Appellant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a proper 1915 motion with the district court.(bjrsl, )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the complaint, the amended complaint, and the action are dismissed as legally frivolous by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 03/04/09. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 02/05/09. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency. Plaintiff has 30 days to file an account statement that is certified by a prison official, and to file a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 USC 1915 complete with prisoner's original signature and on the court's current and proper form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/14/2009. (llk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
