OrbitCom, Inc. v. Qwest Communications Corporation
Plaintiff: OrbitCom, Inc.
Defendant: Qwest Communications Corporation
Case Number: 1:2009cv00181
Filed: January 29, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Walker D. Miller
Presiding Judge: Kristen L. Mix
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER denying 39 Qwests Motion for Attorneys Fees. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/01/2009.(sah, )
August 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER OF RECUSAL directing reassignment to another judge. By Judge Walker D. Miller on 08/25/2009. (sah, )
June 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting 18 Defendant's Motion to Stay Proceedings and Petition to Compel Arbitration. Plaintiff to submit all of its claims under the WSA, as well as the claims set forth in this case, to arbitration. Defendant may file a motion for a ttorneys fees on or before July 27, 2009. Plaintiff may respond on or before August 27, 2009. This case is administratively closed, subject to reopening for good cause. If the parties do not file a stipulation for dismissal with prejudice or a motion to reopen this case for good cause on or before December 28, 2010, this case shall be automatically dismissed without prejudice, by Judge Walker D. Miller on 6/25/09.(gms, )
June 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER denying 26 Defendant's Motion for Temporary Stay of Proceedings Pending Resoluton of Petition to Compel Arbitration and to Vacate Scheduling Order. Court extends deadline for pleading amendments, including filing of counterclaims to 10 days after the District Judge resolves the Motion to Arbitrate, if appropriate, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/15/09.(gmssl, )
June 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MINUTE ORDER granting 32 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply to Defendant's Motion to Stay of Proceedings and Petition to Compel Arbitration. Plaintiff to file sur-rely addressing only issues and arguments raised in reply on or before 6/15/09, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/9/09.(gms, )
March 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting 9 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Stay Pending Determination of Plaintiff's Motion for Remand. The case is stayed, except for the parties' briefing on the Motion to Remand [#8], until such time as the Motion to Remand is resolved. The Scheduling Conference set for 3/30/09 at 10:30 am is Vacated and will be reset, if appropriate, after the District Court's determination on the Motion to Remand, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/16/09.(ebs, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: OrbitCom, Inc. v. Qwest Communications Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: OrbitCom, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Dean Neville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Qwest Communications Corporation
Represented By: Steven James Perfrement
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?