Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Qwest Communications Corp. v. Free Conferencing Corp. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2406
Third Party Plaintiff - Appellant: Qwest Communications Corporation, a Delaware corporation
Third Party Defendant - Appellee: Free Conferencing Corporation, a Nevada corporation
Vernon, et al v. Qwest Communications, et al
as 13-701
Petitioner: ROBIN VERNON, RORY PATRICK DURKIN, BRYAN SANDQUIST and others
Respondent: QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation, QWEST SERVICES CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation, QWEST CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation and others
Don McDaniel, et al v. Qwest Communications Corporat, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-3036
Plaintiff: DON WAYNE MCDANIEL and MARY DRISKILL
Appellant: SUSMAN GROUP
Defendant - Appellee: QWEST COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, LP, LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1327
Plaintiff - Appellee: QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party - Appellee: CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1102
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Interested Party - Interested Party: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Intervenor: JOSHUA JUSTICE-POPE
Qwest Communication Co., LLC v. Sun Coast Merchandise Corp.
as 11-56567
Plaintiff - Appellee: QWEST COMMUNICATION COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, FKA Qwest Communications Corporation
Defendant - Appellant: SUN COAST MERCHANDISE CORPORATION, a California Corporation
Qwest Communication Company v. Sun Coast Merchandise Corp.
as 11-56120
Plaintiff - Appellee: QWEST COMMUNICATION COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, FKA Qwest Communications Corporation
Defendant - Appellant: SUN COAST MERCHANDISE CORPORATION, a California Corporation
Grabwoski et al v. Qwest Communications Company LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00380
Plaintiff: Richard Grabwoski and Connie Grabwoski
Defendant: Qwest Communications Company LLC , Qwest Corporation , Qwest Broadband Services Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wear et al v. Sprint Communications Company L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00809
Plaintiff: John Butcher and Elizabeth Wear
Defendant: Level 3 Communications, LLC, Qwest Communications Corporation, Sprint Communications Company L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Red River Fiber Optic Corp v. Verizon Services Corp et al
as 3:2011cv01010
Plaintiff: Red River Fiber Optic Corporation
Defendant: AT&T Corp , Qwest Communications International Inc , Verizon Services Corp. and others
Counter_claimant: AT&T Corp , Verizon Services Corp. , Verizon Business Network Services, Inc. and others
Counter_defendant: Red River Fiber Optic Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?