Johnson v. Dunbar et al
| Jason Laray Johnson |
| George Dunbar and Jeanne Marie Smith |
| 1:2009cv00380 |
| February 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Chaffee |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the habeas corpus application, the amended application, and the second amended application are denied and the action is dismissed because the claims are procedurally barred by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 06/19/09. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response Applicant may file a Reply by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 04/15/09. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Petitioner to Cure Deficiency. Petitioner has 30 days to file a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action and to file an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 on the court's current and proper forms by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/20/2009. (llk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
