Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 38
PrewittIn re: Prewitt
as 24-119
Petitioner: In re: GEORGE DUNBAR PREWITT, JR.
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Prewitt v. McDaniel
as 3:2023cv03015
Plaintiff: George Dunbar Prewitt, Jr.
Defendant: James Kent McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Marcel Ingram v. George Dunbar, et al
as 23-1710
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARCEL NICOLE INGRAM
Defendant / Appellee: THE HONORABLE GEORGE DUNBAR, In his indiviudal capacity, THE HONORABLE ERIC DAVANZO, In his indiviudal capacity, JOCOB SMELTZ, In his indiviudal capacity and others
County of Yazoo v. Prewitt
as 23-60073
Plaintiff / Appellee: County of Yazoo, Mississippi
Defendant / Appellant: George Dunbar Prewitt, Jr.
INGRAM v. DUNBAR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01594
Plaintiff: MARCEL NICOLE INGRAM
Defendant: THE HONORABLE GEORGE DUNBAR, THE HONORABLE ERIC DAVANZO, JACOB SMELTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PREWITT v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01673
Plaintiff: GEORGE DUNBAR PREWITT, JR.
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
PREWITT v. MCDONOUGH We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02243
Plaintiff: GEORGE DUNBAR PREWITT, JR.
Defendant: DENIS MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US v. Dunbar
as 20-1444
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: REX VERNAL GEOVANEY DUNBAR, a/k/a Chris, a/k/a George Dunbar, a/k/a Andrew Watt
Rocha v. Zavaras, et al
as 11-1460
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARCO A. ROCHA
Defendant - Appellee: A. ZAVARAS, CDOC Director, GEORGE DUNBAR, BVCC Director, RHONA MEDFORD, BVCC Hearing Officer and others
James v. Dunbar, et al
as 11-1146
Petitioner - Appellant: ADRIAN JAMES
Respondent - Appellee: GEORGE DUNBAR and JOHN SUTHERS, the Attorney General of the State of Colorado

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?