Monks v. Astrue
||Michael J. Astrue
||March 3, 2009
||US District Court for the District of Colorado
||Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
||John L. Kane
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||U.S. Government Defendant
|Jury Demanded By:
||42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 23, 2009
ORDER granting 15 Stipulated Motion for Attorney Fees pursuant to Equal Access to Justice Act. Defendant to pay to plaintiff's counsel reasonable attorney fees in the amount of $3,753.00, by Judge John L. Kane on 11/23/09.(gmssl, )
|August 20, 2009
ORDER granting Defendant's 9 Unopposed Motion to Remand. This civil action is remanded to Defendant for additional administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon remand by the Court, the Appeals Council has agreed to remand this matter to an Administrative Law Judge as set forth in this Order. Pursuant to its power under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the Defendants request for remand of this action for further administra tive proceedings, this Court hereby REVERSES the Defendants decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a REMAND of the cause to the Defendant for further administrative proceedings as set out above, and directs the clerk of the court to enter a judgment in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, by Judge John L. Kane on 8/20/09.(lam, )
|June 9, 2009
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 7/20/2009. SS Defendants Brief due by 8/20/2009. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 9/3/2009, by Judge John L. Kane on 6/9/09. (gms, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?