Lachney v. Mesa County Sheriff's Department et al
| Mark A. Lachney |
| Mesa County Sheriff's Department, Stan Hilkey, Farlow, Correctional Healthcare Management, Holmes, Susan Grimsby, Craig Miller and Dougherty |
| 1:2009cv00465 |
| March 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Prison Condition Office |
| Mesa |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER denying 20 Motion to Appoint Counsel and denying 20 Motion for Reconsideration by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 10/01/09.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the amended complaint and the action are dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the pleading requirements by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 06/23/09. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint within 30 days. Order denying as premature 7 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Order denying 8 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 04/08/09.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency. Plaintiff is directed to provide a recent account statement and the addresses for Defendants within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/4/09. (pap, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
