Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hill v. Hall et al
as 3:2026cv01869
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Raw-Shield Hill
Defendant:
Ms. Hall, Sgt. S. Cotton, V. Hazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Holmes
as 26-40438
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Warden Elbert Holmes, Dr. Issac Kwarteng, Bryan Collier and others
Holmes v. State Of Texas et al
as 1:2026cv00307
Plaintiff:
Marvin Gabriel Holmes
Defendant:
State Of Texas, TDCJ, Rick C Thaler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Mario Solis, et al. v. County of Riverside, et al.
as 26-4642
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF MARIO SOLIS, by and through successor in interest, Sara Solis and SARA SOLIS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a public entity, SHIRLEY BAUTISTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Johnson v. Rubinchik et al
as 0:2026cv62010
Plaintiff:
Leroy Johnson
Defendant:
Scott David Rubinchik, Judge Iiona Maxine Holmes, Harold F. Mayor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Holmes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00233
Plaintiff:
Antionette Holmes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Daniel Feldman v. Sreit Ivy Louisville, LLC, et al
as 26-5633
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FELDMAN
Defendant:
SREIT IVY LOUISVILLE, LLC, dba The Ivy Apartment Homes, HIGHMARK RESIDENTIAL, LLC, ASHLEY LEMONS and others
Perales v. Bartow County, Georgia et al
as 4:2026cv00195
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Perales
Defendant:
Bartow County, Georgia, Clark Millsap, Cory Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sivak v. Munger et al
as 1:2026cv00439
Plaintiff:
Lacey Mark Sivak
Defendant:
J. Munger, State of Idaho, Robert Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
