Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Chorazghiazad v. Holmes et al
as 3:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Chorazghiazad
Defendant:
Judge Barbara Holmes and Judge Aleta A. Trauger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIGGS et al v. Bartlett, City of, Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv02780
Plaintiff:
MR. DONALD RIGGS and CHRISTY RIGGS
Defendant:
Bartlett, City of, Tennessee, BENJAMIN ARMSTRONG, ZACHARY MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Buchanan v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv02758
Plaintiff:
Conelius Buchanan
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, J. Baidoo and C. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Holmes et al
as 1:2023cv01252
Plaintiff:
Corey Miller
Defendant:
HSA Holmes, C. Nunnally, Nechol Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02712
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Holmes
Defendant:
Publix Supermarkets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Wardlow et al
as 1:2023cv01147
Plaintiff:
Randy Anderson
Defendant:
Jerry Wardlow, FNU Holmes, FNU Garder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nisbett v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02162
Plaintiff:
Ryan Merven Nisbett
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Commissioner, 201 Shelby County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayes v. Coyle et al
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jamaal M. Mayes
Defendant:
Andrew Coyle, Corey Stokes, Kenneth Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
