Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,242
Holmes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05317
Plaintiff: Phoenix MayaRae Holmes
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnson v. Holms, et al.
as 24-2402
Plaintiff: ADRIAN JOHNSON
Defendant: Sgt D HOLMS, CULLINA, Correctional Officer, BINKO, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Anderson v. City of Alameda et al
as 4:2024cv02157
Plaintiff: Adroa Anderson
Defendant: City of Alameda and Benjamin Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtis, et al. v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-1869
Plaintiff: AILA CURTIS, CIERA AGEE, ALISON ARCHER and others
Defendant: JAY ROBERT INSLEE, PEACEHEALTH, LIZ DUNNE and others
Holmes v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02538
Plaintiff: Stephen Phillip Holmes
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Holmes
as 1:2024at00236
Plaintiff: Dwayne A. Holmes
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
(SS) Holmes vs Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00338
Plaintiff: Dwayne A. Holmes
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Peterson et al v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2024cv00364
Plaintiff: Timothy Peterson, Ashley Scarborough, Daleene Fox and others
Defendant: Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00473
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?