David v. Astrue
| James Richard David, II |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| SSA Noticing |
| 1:2009cv00744 |
| April 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office |
| Denver |
| John L. Kane |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 21 Plaintiff's Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Defendant is to pay $6,520.50 to Plaintiff, payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff's attorney, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 4/8/11.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) This denial of Supplemental Security Income benefits is REVERSED; (2) This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this Order; and (3) This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 09/30/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER. An Oral Argument is set for 12/14/2009 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 602. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 09/16/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
10
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 7/28/2009. SS Defendants Brief due by 8/27/2009. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 9/11/2009, by Judge John L. Kane on 6/15/09. (gmssl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
