Murillo v. Milyard et al
| Arturo Murillo |
| Kevin Milyard and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The |
| 1:2009cv01204 |
| May 26, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Logan |
| Zita L. Weinshienk |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the habeas corpus application is denied and the action dismissed without prejudice as a mixed petition by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 08/14/09. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER to Show Cause. Order that Applicant show cause within 30 days why the habeas corpus application should not be denied as a mixed petition. Order denying 7 Motion for stay and abeyance by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 07/16/09.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response Applicant may file a Reply by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 06/01/09. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
1
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency. Applicant shall have 30 days to file a 1915 motion or pay the filing fee, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/22/09. (jak, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
