Johnson v. Zavaras et al
| Michael David Johnson |
| Aristedes (I) Zavaras, Aristedes Zavaras, Kevin (I) Milyard, Kevin Milyard, Terry (I) Bartruff, Terry Bartruff, Lloyd (I) Waide, Llyod Waide, Raymond (I) Higgins, Raymond Higgins, Shawn (I) Rewoldt and Shawn Rewoldt |
| 1:2009cv01553 |
| July 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Logan |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER. Defendants Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) ( 18 filed in Case No. 09-cv-01147) is GRANTED. Defendants Motion to Dismiss Complaint Filed by Plaintiff Palecek Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) ( 26 filed in Case No. 09- cv-01147) (Plaintiff Palecek has joined the objections to the Magistrate Judges Recommendations filed by Plaintiffs Braxton, Graves, and Johnson) is GRANTED. Defendants Motion to Dismiss Complaint filed by Plaintiff Michael Johnson ( 28 filed in Case No. 09-cv-01147) (he too joins the objections to the Magistrate Judges Recommendations) is GRANTED. Defendants Motion to Dismiss ( 15 filed in Case No. 09-cv-01313) is GRANTED. Defendants Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) ( 24 filed in Case No. 09-cv-01218) is GRANTED. The above action is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 02/01/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
34
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 28 Plaintiffs Motion of Objection to Defendant Shawn Rewoldts Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 09/28/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER. The following four cases- Graves v. Executive Director of the CDOC, 09-cv-01218-PAB-CBS; Johnson v. Executive Director of the CDOC, 09-cv-01313- REB-MEH; Palecek v. Executive Director of the CDOC, 09-cv-01352-ZLW-CBS; and Johnson v. Zavaras, E xecutive Director of the CDOC, 09-cv-01553-MSK-MEH shall be assigned to meand consolidated with this case for all further purposes. The Orders of Reference to Magistrate Judges previously issued in Case Nos. 09-cv-01218-LTB-KMT, 09-cv-01313-LTB-KLM, 09-cv-01552-LTB-KMT, and 09-cv-01553-LTB-KMT are WITHDRAWN and these cases are REASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1. All five cases shall hereafter be designated as Civil Action No. 09-cv-01147-LTB-KMT, and all pleadings and other filings shall be filed in this case only. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 09/25/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 8/6/09. (mskcd)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Granting Service by United States Marshal by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 07/27/09. (wjc, )
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Drawing Case. Case will be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 7/17/09. (gms, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
