Peak Banks of Colorado, Inc. et al v. Omaha Financial Holdings Inc.
Peak Banks of Colorado, Inc. and Thomas Hartley |
Omaha Financial Holdings Inc. |
1:2009cv01640 |
July 10, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Jefferson |
Robert E. Blackburn |
Michael E. Hegarty |
Plaintiff |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice of All Claims and Counterclaims Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41 28 is APPROVED. The Trial Preparation Conference set for 07/09/2010, is VACATED. The Jury Trail set for 07/26/2010 is VACATED. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/16/2009. (sah, ) |
Filing 23 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/23/2009. (mehcd) |
Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 17 the Joint Motion for Protective Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/18/2009. (mehcd) |
Filing 14 TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/24/09. Five (5) day Jury Trial set for 7/26/2010 08:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Trial Preparation Conference set for 7/9/2010 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. (rebsec, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.