Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HARTLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25756
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HARTLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hartley v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00300
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Hartley
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SHARAK et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv00761
Plaintiff:
YAROSLAV SHARAK and OSTAP SHARAK
Defendant:
THOMAS HARTLEY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN DOE-RICHARD ROE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Hartley v. Ability Recovery Services, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00202
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hartley
Defendant:
Ability Recovery Services, LLC and Michael A. Conflitti, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
HARTLEY et al v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv01774
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HARTLEY and VIRGINIA HARTLEY
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
HARTLEY et al v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv04192
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HARTLEY and VIRGINIA HARTLEY
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
HARTLEY et al v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 3:2014cv04192
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HARTLEY and VIRGINIA HARTLEY
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
Guerrero v. City of Kenosha Housing Authority et al
as 2:2010cv01090
Plaintiff:
Norma Guerrero
Defendant:
City of Kenosha Housing Authority, Donna Cook, Edward Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peak Banks of Colorado, Inc. et al v. Omaha Financial Holdings Inc.
as 1:2009cv01640
Plaintiff:
Peak Banks of Colorado, Inc. and Thomas Hartley
Defendant:
Omaha Financial Holdings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
