Aguirre v. Milyard et al
Gilbert Aguirre |
Kevin Milyard and John Suthers |
1:2009cv01710 |
July 20, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Logan |
Philip A. Brimmer |
Kathleen M. Tafoya |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER. The 1 Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is denied and this case is dismissed with prejudice. There is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c), by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/01/2010. (wjc, ) |
Filing 12 ORDER: On or before 4/30/10, the Clerk of the Weld County District Court shall provide to this court the original written record, including transcripts, of Weld County District Court criminal case no. 2004CR475, People v. Gilbert Aguirre. Clerk shall mail a copy of this Order to Clerk of the Weld County District Court, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/12/10. (ebs, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER DRAWING CASE. Ordered that this case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/03/2009. (sah, ) |
Filing 2 ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response Applicant my file a Reply by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 07/23/09. (jjh, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.