Marrakchi v. Napolitano et al
| Issam Benjaafar Marrakchi |
| Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas and Robert Mather |
| 1:2009cv02252 |
| September 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Robert E. Blackburn |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1255 Immigration and Nationality Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER. The defendants Motion To Dismiss 13 filed 12/10/2009, isGRANTED. Under FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1), this case is DISMISSED for lack ofsubject matter jurisdiction. All other pending motions, including those docketed as 21 and 22 , are DENIED as moot. JUDGMENT SHALL ENTER in favor of the defendants, Janet Napolitano, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, and Robert Mather, District Director, Denver Field Office, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, and against the plaintiff, Issam Benjaafar Marrakchi. The defendants are AWARDED their costs to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 09/21/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING: Scheduling Conference set for 12/15/2009 09:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/23/09. (kmtcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
