Bang v. Dunbar et al
| Kyle Douglas Bang |
| George Dunbar, Ari Zavaris and John Suthers |
| 1:2009cv02478 |
| October 22, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Chaffee |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER re: 20 State Court Records. The Clerk shall return the State Court Record. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 04/18/2016. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER. Applicant Kyle Bangs Amended Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 6 is DENIED. No certificate of appealability will issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 2/23/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER that on or before April 15, 2010, the Clerk of the Mesa County District Court shall provide to this Court the original written record, including transcripts, of Mesa County Criminal Case Number 05CR1285, People v. Kyle Douglas Bang. IT IS FURTH ER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on the Clerk of the Mesa County District Court by regular mail to: Clerk of the Mesa County District Court P.O. Box 20000-5030 Grand Junction, CO 81502 by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/26/2010. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Draw Case to A District Judge and to a Magistrate Judge. Claims One, Two and Four are dismissed for the reasons states in this Order. Claim Three shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Judge Christine M. Arguello for Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 02/05/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER that within 21 days Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 21 days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response Applicant may file a Reply. Ordered that if Respondents do not intend to raise either of the affirmative defenses of timeliness of exhaustion of state court remedies, they must notify the Court of that decision in the Pre-Answer Response by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/02/09. (jjh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
