Grosvenor v. Qwest Communications International, Inc. et al
| Rick Grosvenor |
| Qwest Communications International, Inc., Qwest Services Corporation, Qwest Corporation, Qwest Communications Corporation and Qwest Broadband Services, Inc. |
| 1:2009cv02848 |
| December 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Walker D. Miller |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
131
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Qwest's 106 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, in so far as the Court finds that Mr. Grosvenor entered into a contractual agreement with Qwest upon his installation of the internet service and continued to be bound by that agreement throughout the events at issue here. This fact is deemed established for purposes of these proceedings. However, Mr. Grosvenor's 105 Motion for Summary Judgment is also GRANTED, insofar as the Court finds that the arbitration clause in that agreement is illusory and thus unenforceable. The Court directs that the parties contact the Magistrate Judge forthwith to set a Scheduling Conference to address what remains to be done to prepare this matter for trial, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 02/23/2012.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN PARTIES re: 100 Stipulation Motion to Dismiss Certain Parties. Qwest Communications International, Inc., Qwest Communications Company, LLC and Qwest Services Corp, are dismissed from this case with prejudice. Qwest Corporation and Qwest Broadband Services, Inc. will remain as Defendants. The caption will now read Richard Grosvenor v. Qwest Corporation and Qwest Broadband Services, Inc. By Judge Walker D. Miller on 4/21/11.(mnf, )
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER denying 35 Defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Reports and Affidavits, by Judge Walker D. Miller on 2/10/11.(mnf, )
|
|
Filing
89
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 2/9/11. (mnf, )
|
|
Filing
70
MINUTE ORDER granting 68 Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel. Attorney Kristin A. Knudson is relieved of any further representation of Plaintiff, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 11/29/10.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER denying 13 Defendants Qwest Communications International, Inc., Qwest Services Corporation, Qwest Corporation, Qwest Communications Corporation, and Qwest Broadband Services, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration. Denying 62 Motion for Stay. The parties shall schedule a trial to determine whether a valid arbitration agreement exists, by Judge Walker D. Miller on 9/30/10.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER granting 41 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Discovery by Defendants. All discovery is stayed pending the district courts resolution of defendants Motion to Compel Arbitration. The order requiring the parties to file a status report on May 25, 2010, is VACATED. The parties shall file a status report within five days of the order on the motion to compel arbitration to advise whether a scheduling conference should be set. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/1/2010.(kmtcd, )
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING: Scheduling Conference set for 3/25/2010 09:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/6/10. (kmtcd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
