Ridgell-Boltz v. Astrue et al
Laura Ridgell-Boltz |
Michael J. Astrue and U.S. Social Security Administration, The |
1:2010cv00252 |
February 5, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Jefferson |
Richard P. Matsch |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 211 ORDER that the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff an award of attorneys fees in the amount of $241,007.60 and costs of $3,511.89, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/28/2015. (evana, ) |
Filing 208 ORDER Granting 207 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Amend Fee and Costs Exhibit 9, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 5/20/15. (ktera) |
Filing 202 PROPOSED RULING by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/21/2015. (ktera) |
Filing 199 MINUTE ORDER Defendants motion for a pretrial conference 196 is granted. The conference is set for April 23, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/20/15. (ktera) |
Filing 194 ORDER Setting Jury Trial for 5/11/2015 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 9/29/2014. (jsmit) |
Filing 191 ORDER Setting Pretrial Conference for 9/29/2014 at 02:00 PM in Conference Room, Proposed Pretrial Order due by 9/25/2014 in paper form directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m., and lead counsel present in person, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/28/2014. (jsmit) |
Filing 167 ORDER Deferring Rulings on 138 Motion for Attorney Fees and 150 Motion for Review of Costs: determination of these motions is deferred until the results of appeals have been determined or, alternatively, if no appeals are filed, the deferral is until the time for appeal has expired, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/3/2012.(rpmcd) |
Filing 143 ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT U.S. Social Security Administration re 142 , each party to pay their own costs and attorneys fees in connection with this dismissal and the Privacy Act claims by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/26/2012. (rpmcd) |
Filing 135 Stipulation and ORDER Regarding Custody of Exhibits and Depositions re: 134 , by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/2/2012. (rpmcd ) |
Filing 125 Courtroom Minutes for Jury Trial Day Three held on 6/27/2012 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Defendants' Motion for Admission of Defendants' Exhibit S 123 is granted and Exhibit S is received. FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd) |
Filing 119 ORDER Denying Defendants' 118 Motion for Reconsideration re 117 , by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/11/2012.(rpmcd) |
Filing 114 ORDER Setting Jury Trial set 6/25/2012 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/10/2012. (rpmcd ) |
Filing 109 ORDER Granting 108 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Leave to Submit a Proposed Statement of the Case and Verdict Form by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/19/2012.(rpmcd) |
Filing 105 ORDER Vacating Trial set to begin on January 17, 2012 and deferring ruling on 103 Motion for Sanctions, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/10/2012.(rpmcd) |
Filing 101 ORDER Granting 100 Motion to Submit Voir Dire Questions Instanter, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/5/2012.(rpmcd) |
Filing 99 Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 12/29/2011 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Unopposed Motion to Schedule a Second Pretrial Conference 95 , is moot by this setting. Plaintiff's ADEA claim is dismissed. Evidence of retaliati on for protected activity concerning sex and age permitted. Defendants' Opposed Motion for Issuance of Order to Preserve Privileges and Protections 67 , is denied. Proposed voir dire and instructions are to be submitted in paper format directl y to chambers by 4:00 p.m. January 4, 2012. Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration 68 , ruled on as stated on record. (Exhaustion denied and adverse inference / spoilation issues ruled on during trial). Defendants' Motion for Leave to Fi le objections to Plaintiff's Proposed Witness Testimony and Exhibits and to Strike Plaintiff's Plaintiff's Request for a Jury and Compensatory Damages Under the ADEA 83 , ruled on as stated on record. Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Objections to Defendants' Exhibits 90 , is resolved as Court rules on relevance and admissibility issues during the course of the trial.(FTR: Bernique Abiakam) (rpmcd) |
Filing 93 ORDER Granting 92 Motion to Strike 85 and 86 Returns of Service, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/25/2011.(rpmcd) |
Filing 76 ORDER Granting 75 Motion to Amend Exhibit List 70 , by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/11/2011.(rpmcd ) |
Filing 65 ORDER Setting Jury Trial for 1/17/2012 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/29/2011. (rpmcd) |
Filing 41 Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 4/19/2011 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, filed February 24, 2011 21 , is denied with respect to motions for extension of time comparisons and documents reviewed and granted for e-mails between supervisors. Pretrial conference scheduled for July 8, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. (FTR: FTR - K. Terasaki) (rpmcd) |
Filing 15 ORDER TO COMPLY WITH D.C. COLO.LCivR 7.2 in all court filings as to any information to be submitted under seal based on the 14 Protective Order, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/30/2010. (rpmcd) |
Filing 7 ORDER setting Scheduling Conference for 6/18/2010 10:00 AM in Conference Room before Judge Richard P. Matsch. The Proposed Order (Original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on 06/10/10 by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 04/27/10. (jjh, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.