Esquibel v. Chambers et al
Mark Anthony Esquibel |
Carol (I) Chambers, Carol Chambers, Douglas (I) G. Bechtel, Douglas G. Bechtel, (I) Smith, Smith, (I) Todis, Todis, J. (I) Grayson Robinson, J. Grayson Robinson, Brian (I) Williamson and Brian Williamson |
1:2010cv01279 |
June 3, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Arapahoe |
Boyd N. Boland |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 18 Notice of Appeal by Mark Esquibel, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer for Senior Judge Zita Leeson Weinshienk on 08/16/10. Appellant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a 1915 motion with district court.(bjrsl, ) |
Filing 15 ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the Plaintiff's claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 are dismissed without prejudice as premature. Ordered that the Court abstains from exercising jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining claims for damages. Ordered that the complaint and the action are dismissed by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 08/05/10 for Zita Leeson Weinshienk (jjh, ) |
Filing 8 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 06/25/10. (jjh, ) |
Filing 2 ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency. Plaintiff shall have 30 days to file a certified copy of prisoner's trust fund statement, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/2/10. (jak, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.