Ackerman v. Milyard et al
| Edwin M. Ackerman |
| Kevin Milyard and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The |
| 1:2010cv01707 |
| July 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Logan |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
Minute ORDER denying as moot 14 Motion for Clarification by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 08/16/10.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER for Dismissal. Ordered that the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is Denied for lack of jurisdiction. Ordered that no certificate of appealability will issue because Mr. Ackerman has not made a substantial showing that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the procedural ruling is correct and whether the underlying claim has constitutional merit by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 08/11/10 for Zita Leeson Weinshienk(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER granting 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Orderdenying as unnecessary 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 and 9 by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/04/10.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency. Applicant shall have 30 days to file a petition on the proper court form, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/19/10. (jak, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
