Carter v. Astrue
| Susyn K. Carter |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| SSA Noticing |
| 1:2010cv01754 |
| July 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Jefferson |
| John L. Kane |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER. Based on the record, the ALJ could easily have gone the other way. If this Court were reviewing the case de novo, we might come out differently. However, the ALJ appears to have read, understood, and applied the law. His determination that Ms . Carters testimony was not credible is entitled to deference, and there is evidence in the record that supports the decision. This Court cannot find that the Commissioners decision was not supported by substantial evidence, or that the Commissioner applied the incorrect legal standard. Therefore, because of the limited nature of our review, the Commissioners decision is affirmed. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 11/4/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
8
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 11/29/2010. SS Defendants Brief due by 1/6/2011. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 1/21/2011, by Judge John L. Kane on 10/18/10. (gmssl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
