Radick v. USA et al
| Thomas Radick |
| USA, Harley Lappin, Federal Bureau of Prisons, The, Mike Nalley, N. Fields, Garcia, Mark Ippolito, Krause, Garza, Wagoner and Leyba |
| 1:2010cv02504 |
| October 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Arapahoe |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 113 Order on 9/28/12. (lygsl, )
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER. Plaintiffs motion to recuse Magistrate Judge Mix is DENIED. Defendant Watts is ORDERED to file a responsive pleading within twenty-one days of the date of this order, addressing in particular Plaintiff Radicks claims that Watts interfered with Radicks Remedy No. 589160-A1. If Defendant Watts files a responsive pleading that itself requires a response, Plaintiff Radick shall have twenty-one days from being served to respond if he chooses. By Judge David M. Ebel on 3/7/2012.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER. The motion by Defendant Watts to stay responsive pleading deadline 99 filed 7/21/2011 is GRANTED. The Defendants deadline to respond is stayed pending the ruling on the pending Recommendation. By Judge David M. Ebel on 7/22/2011.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
83
MINUTE ORDER. Defendants Motion to Consolidate the Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint 81 is GRANTED. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint 13 on or before 5/23/2011. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/29/2011.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
77
MINUTE ORDER denying Plaintiff's 75 Motion to Clarify, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/4/11.(lsw, )
|
|
Filing
64
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs Motion for Clarification 62 is DENIED. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 2/28/2011.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
59
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs Motion Requesting Immediate Action on Emergency Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 56 is STRICKEN. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 2/18/2011.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
52
AMENDED ORDER. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 2/14/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt, # 2 Process Receipt and Return)(sah, )
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER. Pursuant to the Order Granting Service by United States Marshal 16 , the United States Marshal shall attempt to serve the Summons and Amended Complaint [Docket No. 32] on Defendant Ippolito at the address provided by Plaintiff. The Order to Show Cause 34 is DISCHARGED. Document 47 and 48 are TERMINATED as motions. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 2/14/2011.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 37 Notice of Appeal by Thomas Radick, appellant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a 1915 motion with district court by Judge David M. Ebel on 02/08/11. (bjrsl, )
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER GRANTING SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 2/7/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Process Receipt and Return-Watts, # 2 Certified Mail Receipt)(sah, )
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER GRANTING SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL. By Judge David M. Ebel on 1/20/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Process Receipt and Return, # 2 Process Receipt and Return)(sah, )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Draw Case to A District Judge and to a Magistrate Judge. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 1/12/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/22/10. (jjh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
