Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Radick v. Warden, FCC Coleman USP II
as 5:2018cv00528
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Petitioner: Luke Thomas Radick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Radick v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2017cv00565
Petitioner: Luke Thomas Radick
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Luke Radick
as 16-2711
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: LUKE THOMAS RADICK
Radick v. Potter et al
as 3:2016cv00850
Petitioner: Luke Thomas Radick
Respondent: J. Potter, Federal Detention Center, Philadelphia, Warden, J.L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RADICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv06581
Plaintiff: LUKE THOMAS RADICK
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Radick v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015fp00483
Defendant: FNU Chen, FCI Berlin, Warden, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff: Luke Thomas Radick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radick v. Potter et al
as 1:2015cv00419
Respondent: Bureau of Prisons, Director, M. Davidson, FCI Berlin, Warden and others
Petitioner: Luke Thomas Radick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
IN RE: RADICK
as 2:2015cv01907
Petitioner: LUKE THOMAS RADICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Radick v. Lappin, et al
as 11-1062
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS RADICK
Defendant - Appellee: HARLEY LAPPIN, Director, F.B.O.P., MIKE NALLEY, Regional Director, F.B.O.P., N. FIELDS, Administrative Remedy Coordinator North Central Regional Office and others
Radick v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00298
Petitioner: Thomas Radick
Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons , Harley G. Lappin and Rene Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?