Radick v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
| Thomas Radick |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley G. Lappin and Rene Garcia |
| 1:2011cv00298 |
| February 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Jefferson |
| David M. Ebel |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER. The Amended Application For A Writ Of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 11 is denied with prejudice. By Judge David M. Ebel on 7/11/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER ASSIGNING CASE. This case shall be assigned to Judge David M. Ebel pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1C.1., and to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/31/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER to File Preliminary Response as set forth in the Order, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/7/11. (lyg, )
|
|
Filing
12
Minute ORDER denying as moot 2 7 and 8 The Prisoner's Motions and Affidavits for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action. Applicant's "Motion for Appointment of Counsel," filed on 2/28/11 9 is DENIED as premature. Applicant's "Motion for Clarification," filed on 2/25/11 6 is GRANTED, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/28/11.(lyg, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency, within 30 days, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/17/11. (lyg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
